Text

The Ebola Czar……..

So the know it alls that run the government at current feel it necessary to have an ebola czar but do feel it necessary to actual put someone in that position who has ANY medical or epidemiological experience whatsoever.  What we’ve got is a poltical hack who will take every opportunity to spin the situation for political benefit.  This has all the hallmark of Bush appointed that Brown guy to run FEMA during the Katrina mess.  I just hope a political appointee instead of a qualified one in this case does not get anyone killed.

Link

For all you rabid Bush lied, people died anti-war types here is your freakin’ WMDs!  Thousands of rounds, soldiers injured and told to keep quiet.  Ira

Quote
"

Back in the 18th century, Edmund Burke pointed out that, whatever the institutions of government, most of the outcomes of what it does “must depend upon the exercise of the powers which are left at large to the prudence and uprightness of ministers of state.”

What did the American voters know about the prudence and uprightness of this untried man they elected president, as a result of his glib rhetoric and his racial symbolism? It is not just bad luck when a reckless gamble turns out disastrously.

"

http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2014/10/07/ebola-and-obama-n1901524/page/full

Photo
nowyoukno:

allisoninportland:

bulma-esque:

jessehimself:

ghetto?

Now we all know this is a damn lie.We not gon count Thomas Jeffersons blk kids?

^this

Uhhh…Thomas Jefferson had 6 children with his wife Martha Jefferson, and 6 with Sarah “Sally” Hemings, making the amount of children Jefferson had 12. John Tyler still has the most out of any president, having had 8 from his first wife and 7 from his second: a total of 15 kids. So where is the “damn lie”

There simply is no proof that Jefferson fathered Hemming’s children.  Yes, DNA analysis confirmed that someone in the male Jefferson line fathered the children.   This could be 25 people.

nowyoukno:

allisoninportland:

bulma-esque:

jessehimself:

ghetto?

Now we all know this is a damn lie.
We not gon count Thomas Jeffersons blk kids?

^this

Uhhh…Thomas Jefferson had 6 children with his wife Martha Jefferson, and 6 with Sarah “Sally” Hemings, making the amount of children Jefferson had 12. John Tyler still has the most out of any president, having had 8 from his first wife and 7 from his second: a total of 15 kids. So where is the “damn lie”

There simply is no proof that Jefferson fathered Hemming’s children.  Yes, DNA analysis confirmed that someone in the male Jefferson line fathered the children.   This could be 25 people.

Photo
An inconvenient truth for certain.  Did PP start with racist intentions aimed at lessening births of minorities?  Seems so based on my research……

An inconvenient truth for certain.  Did PP start with racist intentions aimed at lessening births of minorities?  Seems so based on my research……

(Source: matthewpolitical)

Photo
kv96ic28:

NOTE.. This is something that should go viral and let the country know what she has been doing since she was 27 years old.

Don’t worry, the drive-by media will keep this one under wraps until after she wins the election.  

kv96ic28:

NOTE.. This is something that should go viral and let the country know what she has been doing since she was 27 years old.

Don’t worry, the drive-by media will keep this one under wraps until after she wins the election.  

(via wherelibertydwells)

Text

The USA does not have an illegal immigration problem…..

rather Mexico and Central America have a problem with its Native Americans, problems with its lower classes, problems with socio-economics; political system, corruption,  the rule of law, the free market, and a littany of other problems.   These problems, for the last 40 years, are apparently now our responsibility the know-it-alls say.  We have to change our laws because they won’t fix their endemic problems.   Illegal immigration is a symptom not a problem.  We would all be well to work the problem if we can.  

Photo
Quote
"Everything is new if you are ignorant of history. That’s why ideas that have failed repeatedly in centuries past reappear under the banner of “Change” to dazzle them and sweep them off their feet"

Thomas Sowell

Best. Quote. Ever.

(via mrsrandallboggs)

It really is the best quote ever. I know.

(via mrsrandallboggs)

I’m not sure if I’ve reblogged this before, but whatever, it’s awesome.

(via donttreadonvirginia)

This is one of the better quotes floating out there especially given our current political predicament.

(Source: insert-spooky-into-url, via donttreadonvirginia)

Text

George Will Re-Post of the Month

In a 2006 interviewSupreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said the Constitution is “basically about” one word — “democracy” — that appears in neither that document nor the Declaration of Independence. Democracy is America’s way of allocating political power. The Constitution, however, was adopted to confine that power in order to “secure the blessings of” that which simultaneously justifies and limits democratic government — natural liberty.

The argument is between conservatives who say U.S. politics is basically about a condition, liberty, and progressives who say it is about a process, democracy. Progressives, who consider democracy the source of liberty, reverse the Founders’ premise, which was: Liberty preexists governments, which, the Declaration says, are legitimate when “instituted” to “secure” natural rights.

With the Declaration, Americans ceased claiming the rights of aggrieved Englishmen and began asserting rights that are universal because they are natural, meaning necessary for the flourishing of human nature. “In Europe,” wrote James Madison, “charters of liberty have been granted by power,” but America has “charters of power granted by liberty.”

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will041614.php3#.U080_ehX-uY

Quote
"If women were paid 77 cents on the dollar [relative to men for the same work], a profit-oriented firm could dramatically cut labor costs by replacing male employees with females. Progressives assume that businesses nickel-and-dime suppliers, customers, consultants, anyone with whom they come into contact—yet ignore a great opportunity to reduce wages costs by 23%.

They don’t ignore the opportunity because it doesn’t exist."

The ‘77 Cents on the Dollar’ Myth About Women’s Pay (via laliberty)

So very true but don’t count on anyone actually injecting reason into this “income inequality” argument.

There are other statistics that disprove that there is in fact gender pay inequality.  My favorite is the one where never married, middle-age college educated women make roughly 10% more than men of the same cohort.  If there is a vast right wing conspiracy to pay women less how do you square it?

Photo
neonationalist:

The liberal platform.

I am sure there is some conservative double speak if I thought about it but these are right on.

neonationalist:

The liberal platform.

I am sure there is some conservative double speak if I thought about it but these are right on.

(via americas-liberty)